| Nombre | Interpretación y Análisis del SGC ISO 9001:2015 |
|---|---|
| Código | CEPOSIRISO02 |
| Institución |
|
| Nº | Curso | Relevancia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
88% |
| 2 |
|
88% |
| 3 |
|
85% |
| 4 |
|
85% |
| 5 |
|
85% |
| 6 |
|
85% |
| 7 |
|
85% |
| 8 |
|
85% |
| 9 |
|
85% |
| 10 |
|
85% |
| 11 |
|
73% |
| 12 |
|
73% |
| 13 |
|
69% |
| 14 |
|
67% |
| 15 |
|
67% |
| 16 |
|
67% |
| 17 |
|
67% |
| 18 |
|
67% |
| 19 |
|
67% |
| 20 |
|
67% |
| 21 |
|
67% |
| 22 |
|
67% |
| 23 |
|
67% |
| 24 |
|
67% |
| 25 |
|
67% |
| 26 |
|
67% |
| 27 |
|
67% |
| 28 |
|
67% |
| 29 |
|
67% |
| 30 |
|
65% |
| 31 |
|
64% |
| 32 |
|
64% |
| 33 |
|
51% |
| 34 |
|
51% |
| 35 |
|
51% |
| 36 |
|
51% |
| 37 |
|
51% |
| 38 |
|
51% |
| 39 |
|
51% |
| 40 |
|
51% |
| 41 |
|
51% |
| 42 |
|
51% |
| 43 |
|
51% |
| 44 |
|
51% |
| 45 |
|
51% |
| 46 |
|
47% |
| 47 |
|
47% |
| 48 |
|
47% |
| 49 |
|
47% |
| 50 |
|
47% |
| 51 |
|
47% |
| 52 |
|
47% |
| 53 |
|
46% |
| 54 |
|
41% |
| 55 |
|
41% |
| 56 |
|
40% |
| 57 |
|
35% |
| 58 |
|
35% |
| 59 |
|
35% |
| 60 |
|
35% |
| 61 |
|
35% |
| 62 |
|
35% |
| 63 |
|
35% |
| 64 |
|
35% |
| 65 |
|
34% |
| 66 |
|
34% |
| 67 |
|
34% |
| 68 |
|
34% |
| 69 |
|
34% |
| 70 |
|
33% |
| 71 |
|
31% |
| 72 |
|
31% |
| 73 |
|
31% |
| 74 |
|
31% |
| 75 |
|
31% |
| 76 |
|
31% |
| 77 |
|
31% |
| 78 |
|
31% |
Mauro Ramirez A.
Amarilis Navea P.
Carla De la Cruz M.
Juan Opazo C.
Claudia Villa M.
Marcela Muñoz
Paola Herrera
Paola Novoa A.
Felipe Orellana Z.
Jorge Cancino B.
Maria Angelica Larrain B.
Guillermo Pimentel D.